Not expecting to hear snowmobiles in the summer? Be advised snowmobile watercross, known as watercross racing, is gaining in popularity and may be headed your way. Despite negative impacts on the environment, enthusiasts and novices are looking to grow this activity. Here’s what you need to know:
Watercross racing uses modified winter snowmobiles referred to as ‘sleds’ for exhibition or racing, to enable the sled operator to skip, buck, jump and wheelie their way to ferocious speeds (well over 60 mph) across the surface of the water while navigating around a course.
This sport is noted for being fast, and very loud. Although the intention is to hydroplane ‘across’ the water, these sleds (weighing approximately 500 pounds) often sink to the bottom of the lake, pond, or river, serving as the arena. This is considered part of the fun, but this activity causes stress to wildlife and increases the potential for striking animals.
Every year, the Ontario Watercross Racing Association (OWRA) organizes two-day events of this type. An average race day may consist of about 160 to 200 watercross racers on the lake in a given day. This could potentially mean 80 to 100 sleds will sink to the bottom of the lake over the course of two days, followed by equally as many disruptions to the lakebed sediment when the sleds are retrieved.
We are not looking to begrudge anyone having a good time and the OWRA is to be respected for having rules and requirements in place to minimize environmental damage during events. However, this does not alleviate the negative impacts and concerns.
Lakes, ponds, and rivers are critical habitats for many wildlife species, including species at risk such as turtles, and are valued by Ontarians for their beauty and low impact recreation like swimming and canoeing. The increased water vehicle activity and high-speeds impacts species at risk and other vulnerable wildlife, livestock, vegetation, soils, air and water quality, as well as people’s ability to peacefully enjoy nature.
Ontarians should be aware of what watercross racing is should an event be proposed in their communities. The activity should at minimum be kept to communities that have already hosted such events. Ideally, the OWRA would create a facility designed exclusively for this sport, as opposed to introducing watercross into new environments and harming more waterbodies across the province.
With the passing of Bill 23 and the associated policy changes that stand to negatively impact Ontario’s ecosystems, more threats like watercross racing are a cause for concern.
Now more than ever we need to be good stewards of the nature. Indulging in recreational activities for entertainment while disregarding the environment falls into the realm of ‘just because we can doesn’t mean we should’.
To read a more detailed account of watercross racing check out the educational resources on the Think Turtle Conservation Initiative website www.thinkturtle.ca.
Kelly Wallace has been drawn to turtles and nature since she was a child. Utilizing letter-writing campaigns she did what she could through the years to help with animal injustices. It was in 2016 when Kelly moved to Bancroft from Toronto with her husband that she found her footing in conservation. She began by devoting her energies to terminating the legalized hunting of snapping turtles in Ontario. Seeing how much more needed to be done to help turtles the day after the snapping turtle hunt was officially terminated on March 31, 2017 Kelly hit the ground running. She has since founded Think Turtle Conservation Initiative. A grassroots volunteer group focused of education initiatives, raising awareness through sign campaigns, turtle talks, public events, information sharing, and organized fundraisers and engaged in species recovery efforts to ‘effectively’ help the Ontario turtles and their habitat. Kelly Wallace received the Richards Education Award for her tireless efforts to protect turtles in Ontario, which include the founding of the Think Turtle Conservation Initiative: https://thinkturtle.ca/
Guest blogger posting on Ontario Nature's blog about wild species and wild spaces. Together, we are the voice for nature in Ontario.
Thank you very much for your comments Otto. As the author there was plenty more to say on the subject of the negative impacts of watercross racing and related recreational activities but having to meet a word count it was necessary to encapsule certain points. One thing to mention though is that the Ontario Watercross Racing Association (OWRA) does make some noted efforts with regard to only using biodegradable oils, non oxygenated fuel and a 6″ silencer is installed on the exhaust system. to as they they ‘ensure we are impacting the environment as little as possible.’ These are noted efforts and are appreciated. Noise is still an issue and air pollution and emissions is lessened but not eliminated. There are many other negative impacts as a result of watercross racing that are concerning and would have an affect on wildlife, environment and area residents. The concerns mentioned in your comments are very applicable to novices that take to the lakes without taking the environmental precautions OWRA does. Overall, pollution and harm caused by recreational activities is an area that needs ongoing awareness campaigns to generate more thought on this subject followed by action.
Thank you so much John for your kind words and acknowledging the polite manner in which this article was presented. My thoughts align with your own and you make good points. The tact displayed here was to launch province wide awareness, consideration and conversation. Harming the environment for the sake of entertainment is a vast conundrum that needs to be delved into.
The blogger is too polite to write this, but I don’t mind doing so: What other obnoxiously loud, pointless and lowest common denominator entertainment will people come up with next? Perhaps a 400-metre chainsaw relay where teams of competitors race through the woods carrying operating chainsaws instead of batons? Smh.
But on a positive note: Thank you, Kelly, for all of your hard work in advocating for the protection of turtle species. The recognition you have received, as mentioned in your profile, is well deserved.
I saw nothing in the article about the huge amount of pollution that could be caused by spilled gas and oil has well as that would leak from a sunken sled. I would have thought with the high cost of the sides that they would be required to have some kind of device attached that would not allow it to sink. Jet skis are bad enough do we really need another noisy smelly polluting sport on our waterways? Look at what damage dirt bikes and off road vehicles I have in many of our forests and trails.
Due to the ongoing strike, mail delivery, including the distribution of donation receipts, will be temporarily paused. However, when you donate online, you will receive an electronic receipt instantly.
To ensure your support reaches us without delay, we encourage you to donate online or by phone at 1-800-440-2366.
Thank you very much for your comments Otto. As the author there was plenty more to say on the subject of the negative impacts of watercross racing and related recreational activities but having to meet a word count it was necessary to encapsule certain points. One thing to mention though is that the Ontario Watercross Racing Association (OWRA) does make some noted efforts with regard to only using biodegradable oils, non oxygenated fuel and a 6″ silencer is installed on the exhaust system. to as they they ‘ensure we are impacting the environment as little as possible.’ These are noted efforts and are appreciated. Noise is still an issue and air pollution and emissions is lessened but not eliminated. There are many other negative impacts as a result of watercross racing that are concerning and would have an affect on wildlife, environment and area residents. The concerns mentioned in your comments are very applicable to novices that take to the lakes without taking the environmental precautions OWRA does. Overall, pollution and harm caused by recreational activities is an area that needs ongoing awareness campaigns to generate more thought on this subject followed by action.
Thank you so much John for your kind words and acknowledging the polite manner in which this article was presented. My thoughts align with your own and you make good points. The tact displayed here was to launch province wide awareness, consideration and conversation. Harming the environment for the sake of entertainment is a vast conundrum that needs to be delved into.
The blogger is too polite to write this, but I don’t mind doing so: What other obnoxiously loud, pointless and lowest common denominator entertainment will people come up with next? Perhaps a 400-metre chainsaw relay where teams of competitors race through the woods carrying operating chainsaws instead of batons? Smh.
But on a positive note: Thank you, Kelly, for all of your hard work in advocating for the protection of turtle species. The recognition you have received, as mentioned in your profile, is well deserved.
I saw nothing in the article about the huge amount of pollution that could be caused by spilled gas and oil has well as that would leak from a sunken sled. I would have thought with the high cost of the sides that they would be required to have some kind of device attached that would not allow it to sink. Jet skis are bad enough do we really need another noisy smelly polluting sport on our waterways? Look at what damage dirt bikes and off road vehicles I have in many of our forests and trails.