Ontario Nature Blog
Receive email alerts about breaking conservation
and environmental news.
© Lora Denis
Fen, H.N.Crossley Nature Reserve © Smera Sukumar
For Ontarians, some of our most beloved summertime activities revolve around the spectacular Great Lakes. Swimming, boating, fishing and paddling attract millions of us to the waterfront to enjoy time with friends and family (or just ourselves!) out in nature.
Behind the scenes of our summertime fun, there is a secret key actor working overtime to maintain the health and quality of the water: wetlands.
Wetlands are nature’s water purification system; they are constantly filtering out pollutants, sediments and excess nutrients to supply clean water and maintain ecological balance. Researchers Tariq Aziz and Philippe Van Cappellen at the University of Waterloo found in a recent study that wetlands provide an estimated $4.2 billion worth of sediment and phosphorus filtration each year, helping to keep our drinking water, lakes, and rivers clean. Aziz states: “Wetlands are earth’s most valuable ecosystems; these diverse and complex systems provide enormous benefits to humans and other forms of life but are often overlooked.”
Despite the ecological and economic benefits that wetlands provide, the Government has failed to appreciate and protect them. In Southern Ontario, we have lost over 70 percent of our wetlands – over 85 percent in places like Niagara, Toronto, and Essex, Lambton, Kent, Perth and Middlesex Counties. And the loss continues, exacerbating environmental problems such as flooding, water pollution, algal blooms, loss of biodiversity, and shoreline erosion.
Aziz and Cappellen’s study puts a dollar value on one aspect of wetland loss. Simply put, if we continue to dismiss the importance of wetlands, we will need to invest billions in alternative methods to clean water.
The researchers assessed the alternative costs of replacing wetlands with three human-made solutions. Here’s the potential annual bill for each option: 1) constructing wetlands to replace the existing services would cost $2.9 billion per year; 2) using agricultural Best Management Practices to remove phosphorus would cost $13 billion per year; and 3) replacing wetlands by expanding wastewater treatment plants would cost an astounding $164 billion a year.
As Aziz points out, “It is much more cost-effective to protect our existing wetlands than going for conventional land management and water treatment options.”
Wetlands operate within a network: the physical, biological, and hydrological features of the land are all connected and have cascading effects on the environment. While wetlands play a key role in filtration, Aziz suggests that their capacity to do so is not unlimited: “government actors need to invest in reducing water and watershed pollution so that our wetlands are not further choked.” Action must be taken to ensure that environmental policies and plans for economic development are coherent with protection of water resources.
Through wetland conservation and restoration policies and practices, we can mitigate the harmful effects that pollution and excess nutrients have on the water, such as algal blooms or contamination. Immediate action is needed so we and future generations can continue to enjoy these ecosystems for years to come.
Please join Ontario Nature in calling upon political party leaders to protect our precious lands and waters.
Ontario Nature’s wetland initiative is funded by the K.M. Hunter Foundation and the McLean Foundation.
© Lena Morrison
Due to the ongoing strike, mail delivery, including the distribution of donation receipts, will be temporarily paused. However, when you donate online, you will receive an electronic receipt instantly.
To ensure your support reaches us without delay, we encourage you to donate online or by phone at 1-800-440-2366.
Thank you for your generosity and understanding!
“Wetlands are not wastelands.” I read that quote by a writer thirty years ago and have never forgotten it.
Those of us who love nature know and appreciate the intrinsic worth of wetlands. But I’m glad that the university researchers cited in Jenna’s blog have come up with an economic value as well. Often this value is all that those in power understand.