Here we go again. Relentless in the pursuit of its “open for business” agenda the Government of Ontario wants to weaken protections for nature in order to fast-track development across the province.
This time it is targeting the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), Ontario’s primary land use policy, with the goal of “reducing barriers and costs in the land use planning system.” Among other worrisome changes, it is proposing to allow aggregates extraction to trump existing protections for wetlands, woodlands and wildlife habitat, including habitat for threatened and endangered species.
right. The natural world is just one more barrier to business, and according to
the government it must make way for pits and quarries.
The proposal and its “exceptions”
government is proposing to permit aggregates extraction in all significant
natural features currently protected under the PPS: i.e., provincially
significant wetlands (except in southern Ontario), provincially significant
woodlands, valleylands and wildlife habitat, significant Areas of Natural and
Scientific Interest, fish habitat and the habitat of threatened and endangered
species. It would apply across Ontario, except in the Greenbelt.
exceptions are interesting. The government plans to maintain protections for
provincially significant wetlands in southern Ontario, yet many wetlands in the
region have not yet been evaluated for significance. And since evaluation is
not required, unevaluated wetlands which may well be significant would be open
to aggregates extraction.
and northern Ontario, it won’t matter. Significant or not wetlands would be open
As for the Greenbelt exception, once bitten twice shy apparently. After the Bill 66 debacle it seems the government knows better than to mess with the Greenbelt. Still, this exception underlines the vulnerability of nature throughout the rest of Ontario.
Let’s consider, for example, the endangered Jefferson salamander. According to the recovery strategy, isolated sub-populations are all that’s left of “what was once a more extensive, continuous range throughout southern Ontario.” Aggregate extraction is one of the most significant threats to this species. For an animal that shows fidelity to its home turf (mature forests where it forages and overwinters and ponds where it breeds), how likely is rehabilitation – which would occur many years or even decades after disturbance, if ever – to matter?
Put our species before stones and gravel
Yes; Ontarians need stone, sand and gravel for everything from homes to roads to subway tunnels. But the PPS is already heavily weighted in favour of the aggregates industry: it obliges municipalities to protect aggregates resources for long-term use and ensures that companies cannot be required to demonstrate a need for their products. Surely there are better places from which to extract these resources than our most precious and vulnerable natural areas.
This proposal and all other amendments to the PPS must be evaluated in light of the urgent need to respond effectively to the ongoing and accelerating loss of biodiversity here and around the world. If you agree, please join Ontario Nature in voicing your concern.